Friday, August 28, 2009
Celebrity Masons Selling Their Souls
I gotta come back to this. Speaking, is Professor Griff from Public Enemy.
Monday, August 24, 2009
Friday, August 21, 2009
500,000 Plastic Coffins In The Middle of Georga, Millions Across the US
The word is that they're about to separate us into 2 groups of who should live and who should die, and those in the red list will not survive.
The bottom video is the 10 minute footage of someone snooping around the coffins. The top video is interesting. Watch it first.
The bottom video is the 10 minute footage of someone snooping around the coffins. The top video is interesting. Watch it first.
Wednesday, August 19, 2009
A Man Walks From Maine To Mexico With a Cross On His Back
I felt this journey was purposeless, because I don't see the connection in a man thinking "Jesus wants" him to walk to Mexico from Maine. With a similar experience of my own, I remember the freedom of just being out on a spiritual journey ...free without money and God's covering over me with His Love and Protection is so divine, that this guys experience makes me remember it. However, being real-er than when I first posted this video, I honestly don't see the point. In God's name I'll wish everyone love, faith, exercise, protection, and shelter ...but I can't say that I see the purpose in this journey. Like Jesus? Jesus didn't rock a cross on his back just to prove a point that he loved God. Have contempt for the wicked and represent the truth, and if they hate your innocence, don't make concessions to sell your soul to be just like them, and if only God should grant them the authority to bring death upon you, THEN AND ONLY THEN, CARRY YOUR CROSS!
What is this?
What is this?
Wednesday, August 12, 2009
Make Money with Google Ads; Are they scams?
Those google income offers are not an income opportunity that is offered by Google, but an independent company trying to sell you a way to get rich "using" Google's services.
# 1 Google's pay per click service is not subscription based.
At the point at which these companies ask you to pay $80+ per month to become a member of their network that should raise a red flag, and you should not try it.
#2 If you buy $1,000 in pay per click (check Google for exact details), they'll set up your PPC for you to help you maximize your sales for the products that you're selling through their search engine, because they want your repeat business.
People are getting scammed, but that aren't even aware of what company is running the scam. It's not Google.
A long time ago, I did a program like that called "Googad", that used the same concept. Trial based on paying for the shipping of a CD ROM, and then a monthly subsription for what was supposed to be the forum of wealth (so-to-speak) that would have marketing and PPC techniques and 24hr support to help me make money with google.
...but that wasn't google, my friends.
I read the fine print on a site I visited recently, and spoke to someone at customer service for the site I was at, and I knew they wanted $80 somethin' per month, before I bought into the trial. The value they tried to build into that $83 was the amount of money you could make. Of course, if I'm making $10,000 per month $83 ain't nothing, but if what I gotta do is post an affiliate link to a similar website, getting people to buy into this $83 service (which is what I see repeatedly), then that says a lot about where the money's coming from, and that's some b*** s*** to me. You're not making money selling a product on google, you're making money selling "the google money making machine" as the product.
I look at how the person is promoting what they want me to buy into. If I find out about it on a search engine, then I figure that's how I gotta promote it to hit my target market. If it's a message on a message board, a direct message in a social network, or an email ...then I figure that's what I gotta do (either in time spent in free online marketing or in ad money) to find customers for the product.
With the Google money thing ...I see alot of fraudulent ads on blogs that pretend to be an article in a viable news paper, when it's not ...or a video with someone flossing a rediculous amount of money that they earned ...and I couldn't possibly duplicate that just starting out as a newbie. If an individual has to floss how much their making to sell it, then it's probably not worth getting into, because you come into it making "$0" = No proof = No sales for you.
So, my suggestion is to look at the product, and if it's something that you can use and are willing to market to others, then go for it!
If it's something that in the time you spend promoting it - is turning sales in a way that's worthwhile to you, then keep at it!
Sales is all in the presentation in anything you buy into online, because #1 there's absolutely no way to test the product, unless it's a digital product (music, video, ebook, software, game, etc..), so know your role and create a hot ass presentation for whatever it is you're selling, or fall back and do something else.
# 1 Google's pay per click service is not subscription based.
At the point at which these companies ask you to pay $80+ per month to become a member of their network that should raise a red flag, and you should not try it.
#2 If you buy $1,000 in pay per click (check Google for exact details), they'll set up your PPC for you to help you maximize your sales for the products that you're selling through their search engine, because they want your repeat business.
People are getting scammed, but that aren't even aware of what company is running the scam. It's not Google.
A long time ago, I did a program like that called "Googad", that used the same concept. Trial based on paying for the shipping of a CD ROM, and then a monthly subsription for what was supposed to be the forum of wealth (so-to-speak) that would have marketing and PPC techniques and 24hr support to help me make money with google.
...but that wasn't google, my friends.
I read the fine print on a site I visited recently, and spoke to someone at customer service for the site I was at, and I knew they wanted $80 somethin' per month, before I bought into the trial. The value they tried to build into that $83 was the amount of money you could make. Of course, if I'm making $10,000 per month $83 ain't nothing, but if what I gotta do is post an affiliate link to a similar website, getting people to buy into this $83 service (which is what I see repeatedly), then that says a lot about where the money's coming from, and that's some b*** s*** to me. You're not making money selling a product on google, you're making money selling "the google money making machine" as the product.
I look at how the person is promoting what they want me to buy into. If I find out about it on a search engine, then I figure that's how I gotta promote it to hit my target market. If it's a message on a message board, a direct message in a social network, or an email ...then I figure that's what I gotta do (either in time spent in free online marketing or in ad money) to find customers for the product.
With the Google money thing ...I see alot of fraudulent ads on blogs that pretend to be an article in a viable news paper, when it's not ...or a video with someone flossing a rediculous amount of money that they earned ...and I couldn't possibly duplicate that just starting out as a newbie. If an individual has to floss how much their making to sell it, then it's probably not worth getting into, because you come into it making "$0" = No proof = No sales for you.
So, my suggestion is to look at the product, and if it's something that you can use and are willing to market to others, then go for it!
If it's something that in the time you spend promoting it - is turning sales in a way that's worthwhile to you, then keep at it!
Sales is all in the presentation in anything you buy into online, because #1 there's absolutely no way to test the product, unless it's a digital product (music, video, ebook, software, game, etc..), so know your role and create a hot ass presentation for whatever it is you're selling, or fall back and do something else.
Tuesday, August 11, 2009
Hip Hop is Like Anything Goes as Long as it Sold
I got tired of hearing people say wack rappers were real Hip Hop or the new era of Hip Hop, as if their music is the evolution of it, when it's clearly not.
Just because a dance is a dance and Hip Hop cultivates dance, like beats to rhymes, and spinning the tables to making beats, graffiti, etc...
...DOES NOT MEAN that everybody that picks up a mic is hot. A lot of so-call rappers out there are wack!!! and that's why those who try to preserve what REAL HIP HOP is don't like to associate those artists as being Hip Hop artists. We're not jealous of success in Hip Hop, either we love what you do or we don't. Nobody'smad that your song is served up with a dance. Back in the day we had the snake, the whop, the Pee-Wee Herman (turned into a rap dance record), and so many other joints. Nobody hates a kid in Hip Hop because his song has a dance.
Though, when the boy can barely rhyme to a beat, sings unbearably off key as a hook, and his beats are wack, then the dance ain't gonna save it, not in it's musicial form. It's wack for the most part. If that can be real hip hop, then anything and everything is.
If it uses a drum machine ...it's hip hop?
If it's associated with a dance ...it's hip hop?
If it tries to rhyme to a beat ...it's hip hop?
If it sings is it R&B???
NO!
...I'm getting real sick of posers who try to adopt the culture like Madonna with an African baby, feeling like this gives them some authenticity as to what Hip Hop is and what those who are Hip Hop should accept as Hip Hop, saying "I bought it/adopted it", "I did the research", "This was that and that is this"
...For the record: My point of view isn't meant to be racist, and I know it sounds like it is, but I loved the Beastie Boys. They were Hip Hop to me. Vanilla Ice WASN't. I don't care if he sold or none of that. KRS-1 was The Best at one point in the time-line. PM DAWN - 0 - They sucked
However, Hip Hop had soul, and the more I come to understand what it was that I loved about Hip Hop, I know it had nothing to do with murder, pimpin, hoes, bling, or wanna be ass rappers with a new dance.
Yes it was about dance, and it was about rap lyrics with the most phenominal deliveries, and the beats were #1, but the way commercialism has success structured in what they might call a successful song, album, or even a classic is full of politics advertised through gimmicks and gestures, which is a whole bunch of bull sh** solidified by statistics/sales.
I love Hip Hop for what Hip Hop used to mean to me.
That love is what becomes future, leaving the rest behind to be forgotten and destroyed.
If those that I respected as being my love of Hip Hop, who started Hip Hop in my life ....if they're gonna let the bull sh** fly and sell their soul to the politics, then what I do needs a new name that isn't Hip Hop to be served on a new platform that isn't industrial.
...and WTF is Hip-Pop ...that's self-degrading in anybody who accepts that badge, cause basically you're just saying you aren't good enough to be Hip Hop, so you'll settle for less as long it emulates what sells more.
Just because a dance is a dance and Hip Hop cultivates dance, like beats to rhymes, and spinning the tables to making beats, graffiti, etc...
...DOES NOT MEAN that everybody that picks up a mic is hot. A lot of so-call rappers out there are wack!!! and that's why those who try to preserve what REAL HIP HOP is don't like to associate those artists as being Hip Hop artists. We're not jealous of success in Hip Hop, either we love what you do or we don't. Nobody'smad that your song is served up with a dance. Back in the day we had the snake, the whop, the Pee-Wee Herman (turned into a rap dance record), and so many other joints. Nobody hates a kid in Hip Hop because his song has a dance.
Though, when the boy can barely rhyme to a beat, sings unbearably off key as a hook, and his beats are wack, then the dance ain't gonna save it, not in it's musicial form. It's wack for the most part. If that can be real hip hop, then anything and everything is.
If it uses a drum machine ...it's hip hop?
If it's associated with a dance ...it's hip hop?
If it tries to rhyme to a beat ...it's hip hop?
If it sings is it R&B???
NO!
...I'm getting real sick of posers who try to adopt the culture like Madonna with an African baby, feeling like this gives them some authenticity as to what Hip Hop is and what those who are Hip Hop should accept as Hip Hop, saying "I bought it/adopted it", "I did the research", "This was that and that is this"
...For the record: My point of view isn't meant to be racist, and I know it sounds like it is, but I loved the Beastie Boys. They were Hip Hop to me. Vanilla Ice WASN't. I don't care if he sold or none of that. KRS-1 was The Best at one point in the time-line. PM DAWN - 0 - They sucked
However, Hip Hop had soul, and the more I come to understand what it was that I loved about Hip Hop, I know it had nothing to do with murder, pimpin, hoes, bling, or wanna be ass rappers with a new dance.
Yes it was about dance, and it was about rap lyrics with the most phenominal deliveries, and the beats were #1, but the way commercialism has success structured in what they might call a successful song, album, or even a classic is full of politics advertised through gimmicks and gestures, which is a whole bunch of bull sh** solidified by statistics/sales.
I love Hip Hop for what Hip Hop used to mean to me.
That love is what becomes future, leaving the rest behind to be forgotten and destroyed.
If those that I respected as being my love of Hip Hop, who started Hip Hop in my life ....if they're gonna let the bull sh** fly and sell their soul to the politics, then what I do needs a new name that isn't Hip Hop to be served on a new platform that isn't industrial.
...and WTF is Hip-Pop ...that's self-degrading in anybody who accepts that badge, cause basically you're just saying you aren't good enough to be Hip Hop, so you'll settle for less as long it emulates what sells more.
Saturday, August 1, 2009
Beyond Demonic Impression
I don't exploit communication on any frequency or any medium. The affinity that some people seem to have with the dead, the number 6, and creating their own religion is horrific and only going to manifest blasphemy, moreso against The Spirit of Truth, than any man's religion. The punishment of works that manipulate other people's rhyme and reason through seances, Ouija boards, and such ...are worse than anything that has ever taken a man to his grave, and worse than any fear that a man has ever had about a beast, life, death, or his own after life.
I don't create my own religion. I just exemplify what I know is right. There's more to life than fame and money, and I wouldn't exploit the purpose of reaching the masses with anything. Darkness and Light itself isn't a characteristic of either good or evil, because good and evil exists within them both. Still, I don't bond with the darkness that is symbolic to monstrous images intended to render submission through fear, nor spiritual hacking in mishandling multi-dimensional forms of communication and/or existing. What they attempt to conduct, who approach you with their man-made religion and spiritual manipulation, is piracy.
I don't create my own religion. I just exemplify what I know is right. There's more to life than fame and money, and I wouldn't exploit the purpose of reaching the masses with anything. Darkness and Light itself isn't a characteristic of either good or evil, because good and evil exists within them both. Still, I don't bond with the darkness that is symbolic to monstrous images intended to render submission through fear, nor spiritual hacking in mishandling multi-dimensional forms of communication and/or existing. What they attempt to conduct, who approach you with their man-made religion and spiritual manipulation, is piracy.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)